A chilling revelation about Sir Keir Starmer's past is about to unfold, offering a glimpse into his true beliefs and intentions. This article will challenge your understanding of the man and his politics, revealing a side that is far more radical than most realize.
The future of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is a hotly contested issue in British politics, and it's at the heart of the debate surrounding illegal immigration and the rise of Reform. The inability of the British state to control its borders and remove illegal entrants has become a symbol of failure, driving a wedge between political parties and their supporters.
Kemi Badenoch, a Conservative politician, recently pledged that if her party returns to power, they will leave the ECHR, aiming to curb judicial activism and protect the nation's borders, veterans, and citizens. The Conservatives advocate a return to common law protections of civil liberty, while Reform proposes a British Bill of Rights. Both parties agree that the current interpretation of the ECHR by judges is problematic, making it difficult for the government to manage illegal migration.
However, the Labour Party stands on the other side of this divide, strongly supporting the ECHR. But their commitment goes deeper than most realize, and it's here that we uncover the true beliefs of a young Keir Starmer.
Thirty years ago, Starmer, then a 32-year-old barrister and rising star, wrote an article in Socialist Lawyer about Tony Blair's plan to incorporate the ECHR into UK law. His support for this move was unequivocal, stating that socialists should embrace a domestic bill of rights, as it forms the foundation of a new legal order.
But Starmer's support went beyond the basic liberties outlined in the ECHR. He advocated for a maximalist approach, arguing that Labour should champion social and economic rights alongside civil and political rights. He endorsed legal theorists who proposed expanding human rights to include jobs, food, and housing, stating that the real debate should be about the extent of these provisions, not their existence.
This article reveals Starmer's true colors, showing that he doesn't merely support human rights; he wants to expand them significantly. He envisions a world where social rights, such as work, housing, and healthcare, are not just policies subject to democratic debate but legally enforceable human rights.
In his own words, Starmer chillingly warned of the need to dismantle common law rules governing property entitlements, a statement that should give us pause as we navigate the economic challenges ahead.
This article serves as a stark reminder that we should never underestimate the power of ideology and the potential impact of our leaders' beliefs.
Sir Simon Clarke, Director of the center-right thinktank Onward, invites you to consider these revelations and join the discussion. Do you agree with Starmer's vision for an expanded human rights agenda? Or do you believe in a more traditional approach to civil liberties? The floor is open for debate.
